prop-167: Published Statistics on Directory Service Usage
| Proposal text | prop-167-v002 |
|---|---|
| Objective |
This proposal suggests to provide APNIC members and stakeholders with visibility into the use of WHOIS and RDAP services. |
| Current status | Reached Consensus at APNIC 60 |
| Authors |
Jonathan Brewer |
| Relevant forum | Policy SIG |
| Previous versions | prop-167-v001 |
| Secretariat impact assessment |
This Impact assessment is for prop-167-v0021. APNIC’s Understanding of the Proposed PolicyThis Policy Proposal would require APNIC to provide Resource Holders and other stakeholders with visibility into the use of WHOIS and RDAP services. APNIC would publish the Statistics about directory services usage to include the following data points:
The Data should be updated hourly and be published in a machine readable format such as JSON or CSV Amendment v002: APNIC would be required to provide a feature allowing resource holders to to view access statistics for their resources via the MyAPNIC portal. 2. Impact of Proposed Policy on Registry and Addressing SystemThere is no impact expected on the Registry and Addressing systems 3. Impact of Proposed Policy on APNIC Operation/ServicesThere is a medium level of impact on the Software teams. This data is already available to our technical teams for internal use. No Service Level Agreement (SLA) will be attached to the data availability and the data will be published on a “Best-Effort” basis. Amendment: v002 4. Legal Impact of PolicyAPNIC is currently developing an enhanced privacy compliance program which will culminate in a revised Privacy Statement. The collection and publication of this usage data, if the Proposed Policy reaches consensus, it will be factored into this program and the resulting updated Privacy Statement. APNIC will implement terms of use for these services in the future and will take into account this tracking and reporting as part of the development of such terms. 5. ImplementationIf this Policy Proposal reaches consensus, the implementation time frame would be approximately 3 months subject to the call for editorial comments period. Amendment: v002 If the required works are possible, it would take in excess of 12 Months to complete. |
| Proposal history | |
| 05 August 2025 | Version 1 posted to the Policy SIG mailing list for community discussion. |
| 15 August 2025 | Impact Analysis published and posted to the Policy SIG mailing list for community discussion. |
| 21 August 2025 | Version 2 posted to the Policy SIG mailing list for community discussion. |
| 11 September 2025 | Reached consensus at APNIC 60. Final call for comments. |
| 11 September 2025 | Amendments made to Impact analysis for Version 2 |
| 14 October 2025 | End of Final call for comments. Sent to the EC for Endorsement |