prop-124: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

Proposal textprop-124-v005
SynopsisSection 2.2.3. (Definitions/Assigned Address Space), explicitly prohibits such assignments, stating that “Assigned … may not be sub-assigned”.

https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/resources#2.2.3.-Assigned-address-space

This proposal clarifies this situation in this regard and better define the concept, particularly considering new uses of IPv6 (RFC 8273), by means of a new paragraph.

Current statusDid not reach consensus at APNIC 46 and returned to the mailing list for further discussion.
AuthorJordi Palet Martínez
Relevant forumPolicy SIG
Previous versionsprop-124-v004
Status at other RIRsThis situation, has already been corrected in RIPE, and the policy was updated in a similar way, even if right now there is a small discrepancy between the policy text that reached consensus and the RIPE NCC Impact Analysis. A new policy proposal has been submitted to amend that, and the text is the same as presented by this proposal at APNIC. Same text has also been submitted to AfriNIC (already reached consensus), LACNIC and ARIN.
Proposal history
29 March 2018Version 1 posted to the Policy SIG mailing list for discussion and community development.
10 April 2018Version 2 posted to the Policy SIG mailing list for discussion and community development.
08 August 2018Version 3 posted to the mailing list.
09 September 2018Version 4 posted to the mailing list.
17 September 2018posted to the mailing list for further discussion.
10 January 2019Version 5 posted to the mailing list.