|Objective||This proposal seeks to clarify the use of electronic means to measure consensus for remote participation, process to withdraw a proposal, and change of “general agreement” to be consistent with the actual practice.|
|Current status||Withdrawn by the author|
|Author||Jordi Palet Martínez|
|Relevant forum||Policy SIG|
prop-126 abandoned after APNIC 48
|Status at other RIRs||PDP is different in the different RIRs.|
|Secretariat impact assessment|
No foreseen change on APNIC Services procedures or systems as a result of this policy proposal.
For reference and definition of “Rough Consensus” suggest adding RFC 7282 to the proposed text.
It is difficult to keep track of proposals “expire in six months” may be change to “expire at the next OPM”.
Given that rough consensus is defined under RFC 7282 – no further comments.
within 3 months.
|20 January 2020||Version 1 posted to the Policy SIG mailing list for discussion and community development.|
|16 February 2020||Version 2 posted to the Policy SIG mailing list for discussion.|
|20 February 2020||Withdrawn by the author|