|
apnic-089-v011.txt |
|
apnic-089-v012.txt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
——————————————————————– |
|
——————————————————————– |
|
|
APNIC Document identity |
|
APNIC Document identity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: IPv6 address allocation and assignment policy |
|
Title: IPv6 address allocation and assignment policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short title: ipv6-address-policy |
|
Short title: ipv6-address-policy |
|
|
Document ref: APNIC-089 |
|
Document ref: APNIC-089 |
|
|
|
Version: 011 |
|
Version: 012 |
|
|
Date of original publication: 1 July 2002 |
|
Date of original publication: 1 July 2002 |
|
|
|
Date of this version: 19 August 2012 |
|
Date of this version: 18 February 2013 |
|
|
Review scheduled: n/a |
|
Review scheduled: n/a |
|
|
|
Obsoletes: apnic-089-v010 |
|
Obsoletes: apnic-089-v011 |
|
|
Status: Active |
|
Status: Obsolete |
|
|
Comments: Implementation of prop-102 |
|
Comments: Obsoleted by apnic-127 |
|
|
——————————————————————– |
|
——————————————————————– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status of this Memo |
|
Status of this Memo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document was initially developed through joint discussions |
|
This document was initially developed through joint discussions |
|
|
among the APNIC, ARIN and RIPE communities. The document also |
|
among the APNIC, ARIN and RIPE communities. The document also |
|
|
incorporates APNIC-specific policies developed since that time. |
|
incorporates APNIC-specific policies developed since that time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skipping to change at line 111 |
|
skipping to change at line 111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 Reverse lookup |
|
5.7 Reverse lookup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 Existing IPv6 address space holders |
|
5.8 Existing IPv6 address space holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 Portable assignments |
|
5.9 Portable assignments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9.1 Small multihoming assignments |
|
5.9.1 Small multihoming assignments |
|
|
5.9.2 Internet Exchange Points |
|
5.9.2 Internet Exchange Points |
|
|
5.9.3 Critical infrastructure |
|
5.9.3 Critical infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
5.9.4 Provider Independent assignment |
|
|
|
|
5.9.4.1 Initial assignment |
|
|
|
|
5.9.4.2 Subsequent assignment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. References |
|
6. References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Appendix A: HD-Ratio |
|
7. Appendix A: HD-Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Appendix B: Background information |
|
8. Appendix B: Background information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 Background |
|
8.1 Background |
|
|
8.2 Why a joint policy |
|
8.2 Why a joint policy |
|
|
8.3 The size of IPv6’s address space |
|
8.3 The size of IPv6’s address space |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skipping to change at line 654 |
|
skipping to change at line 657 |
|
|
address blocks in many cases) that was already reserved by the RIR |
|
address blocks in many cases) that was already reserved by the RIR |
|
|
for a subsequent allocation to the organization. Requests for |
|
for a subsequent allocation to the organization. Requests for |
|
|
additional space beyond the minimum /32 size will be evaluated as |
|
additional space beyond the minimum /32 size will be evaluated as |
|
|
discussed elsewhere in the document. |
|
discussed elsewhere in the document. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 Portable assignments |
|
5.9 Portable assignments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9.1 Small multihoming assignments |
|
5.9.1 Small multihoming assignments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An organization is eligible to receive a portable assignment from |
|
An organization is eligible to receive a portable assignment from |
|
|
|
APNIC if it is currently multihomed or plans to be multihomed |
|
APNIC if it is currently, or plans to be, multihomed. |
|
|
within three months. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An organization is considered to be multihomed if its network |
|
An organization is considered to be multihomed if its network |
|
|
receives full-time connectivity from more than one ISP and has one |
|
receives full-time connectivity from more than one ISP and has one |
|
|
or more routing prefixes announced by at least two of its ISPs. |
|
or more routing prefixes announced by at least two of its ISPs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum assignment made under these terms is /48. |
|
The minimum assignment made under these terms is /48. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address space assigned under these terms and not used for |
|
|
|
|
multihoming three months after assignment by APNIC will be |
|
|
|
|
reclaimed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9.2 Internet Exchange Points |
|
5.9.2 Internet Exchange Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet Exchange Points are eligible to receive a portable |
|
Internet Exchange Points are eligible to receive a portable |
|
|
assignment from APNIC to be used exclusively to connect the IXP |
|
assignment from APNIC to be used exclusively to connect the IXP |
|
|
participant devices to the Exchange Point. |
|
participant devices to the Exchange Point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum assignment made under these terms is /48. |
|
The minimum assignment made under these terms is /48. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global routability of the portable assignment is left to the |
|
Global routability of the portable assignment is left to the |
|
|
discretion of the IXP and its participants. |
|
discretion of the IXP and its participants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skipping to change at line 702 |
|
skipping to change at line 700 |
|
|
actual operators of the network infrastructure performing such |
|
actual operators of the network infrastructure performing such |
|
|
functions. Registrar organizations which do not actually host the |
|
functions. Registrar organizations which do not actually host the |
|
|
network housing the registry infrastructure, will not be eligible |
|
network housing the registry infrastructure, will not be eligible |
|
|
for an assignment under this policy. |
|
for an assignment under this policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maximum assignment made under these terms is /32 per operator. |
|
The maximum assignment made under these terms is /32 per operator. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchanges made under this policy remain subject to the address |
|
Exchanges made under this policy remain subject to the address |
|
|
space license policy. |
|
space license policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9.4 Provider Independent assignment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizations with a previously delegated IPv4 assignment from |
|
|
|
|
APNIC are eligible for an appropriately sized IPv6 block under |
|
|
|
|
Section 5.1 above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requests made under 5.9.4 must include a detailed plan of intended |
|
|
|
|
usage of the proposed address block over at least the 12 months |
|
|
|
|
following the allocation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9.4.1 Initial assignment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizations are eligible for an IPv6 Provider Independent |
|
|
|
|
delegation if they are able to demonstrate a valid reason that an |
|
|
|
|
assignment from their ISP, or LIR, is not suitable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For guidelines on what will be considered a valid technical or |
|
|
|
|
other reason, see “APNIC guidelines for IPv6 allocation and |
|
|
|
|
assignment requests”. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.apnic.net/ipv6-guidelines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum assignment made under this policy is a /48. Larger |
|
|
|
|
blocks may be delegated in circumstances outlined in “APNIC |
|
|
|
|
guidelines for IPv6 allocation and assignment requests”. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.apnic.net/ipv6-guidelines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9.4.2 Subsequent assignment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent Provider Independent assignments may be delegated to |
|
|
|
|
organizations that are able to demonstrate why an additional |
|
|
|
|
portable assignment is required and why an assignment from an ISP |
|
|
|
|
or other LIR cannot be used for this purpose; that the use of the |
|
|
|
|
initial provider independent delegation generated the minimum |
|
|
|
|
possible number of global routing announcements and the maximum |
|
|
|
|
aggregation of that block; and, how the subsequent assignment will |
|
|
|
|
be managed to minimise the growth of the global IPv6 routing |
|
|
|
|
table. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. References |
|
6. References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RFC1715] “The H Ratio for Address Assignment Efficiency”, C. |
|
[RFC1715] “The H Ratio for Address Assignment Efficiency”, C. |
|
|
Huitema. November 1994, RFC 1715. |
|
Huitema. November 1994, RFC 1715. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[IAB-Request] “Email from IAB to IANA“, |
|
[IAB-Request] “Email from IAB to IANA“, |
|
|
http://www.iab.org/iab/DOCUMENTS/IPv6addressspace.txt. |
|
http://www.iab.org/iab/DOCUMENTS/IPv6addressspace.txt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RFC2373] “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture”, R. Hinden, S. |
|
[RFC2373] “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture”, R. Hinden, S. |
|
|
Deering. July 1998, RFC 2373. |
|
Deering. July 1998, RFC 2373. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of changes. 7 change blocks. |
|
11 lines changed or deleted |
|
49 lines changed or added |
|
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.42. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |