|
apnic-089-v001.txt |
|
apnic-089-v002.txt |
|
|
|
|
|
——————————————————————- |
|
|
APNIC Document identity |
|
APNIC Document identity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
Title: IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short title: ipv6-address-policy |
|
Short title: ipv6-address-policy |
|
|
Document ref: APNIC-089 |
|
Document ref: APNIC-089 |
|
|
Version: 001 |
|
Version: 002 |
|
|
Date of original publication: 1 July 2002 |
|
Date of original publication: 1 July 2002 |
|
|
Date of this version: 1 July 2002 |
|
Date of this version: 16 August 2004 |
|
|
Review scheduled: n/a |
|
Review scheduled: n/a |
|
|
Obsoletes: n/a |
|
Obsoletes: n/a |
|
|
Status: Obsolete |
|
Status: Obsolete |
|
|
Comments: n/a |
|
Comments: n/a |
|
|
——————————————————————– |
|
——————————————————————– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
|
|
June 26 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status of this Memo |
|
Status of this Memo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document was developed through joint discussions among the |
|
This document was developed through joint discussions among the |
|
|
APNIC, ARIN and RIPE communities. |
|
APNIC, ARIN and RIPE communities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document defines registry policies for the assignment and |
|
This document defines registry policies for the assignment and |
|
|
allocation of globally-unique IPv6 addresses to ISPs and other |
|
allocation of globally-unique IPv6 addresses to ISPs and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skipping to change at line 67 |
|
skipping to change at line 66 |
|
|
3.4. Aggregation |
|
3.4. Aggregation |
|
|
3.5. Conservation |
|
3.5. Conservation |
|
|
3.6. Fairness |
|
3.6. Fairness |
|
|
3.7. Minimized Overhead |
|
3.7. Minimized Overhead |
|
|
3.8. Conflict of goals |
|
3.8. Conflict of goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. IPv6 Policy Principles |
|
4. IPv6 Policy Principles |
|
|
4.1. Address space not to be considered property |
|
4.1. Address space not to be considered property |
|
|
4.2. Routability not guaranteed |
|
4.2. Routability not guaranteed |
|
|
4.3. Minimum Allocation |
|
4.3. Minimum Allocation |
|
|
|
4.4. Consideration of IPv4 Infrastructure |
|
4.4. Consideration of IPv4 infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Policies for allocations and assignments |
|
5. Policies for allocations and assignments |
|
|
5.1. Initial allocation |
|
5.1. Initial allocation |
|
|
5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria |
|
5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria |
|
|
|
5.1.2. Initial allocation size |
|
5.1.2. Minimum initial allocation size |
|
|
|
|
5.1.3. Larger initial allocations |
|
|
5.2. Subsequent allocation |
|
5.2. Subsequent allocation |
|
|
5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria |
|
5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria |
|
|
5.2.2. Applied HD-Ratio |
|
5.2.2. Applied HD-Ratio |
|
|
5.2.3. Subsequent Allocation Size |
|
5.2.3. Subsequent Allocation Size |
|
|
5.3. LIR-to-ISP allocation |
|
5.3. LIR-to-ISP allocation |
|
|
5.4. Assignment |
|
5.4. Assignment |
|
|
5.4.1. Assignment address space size |
|
5.4.1. Assignment address space size |
|
|
5.4.2. Assignment of multiple /48s to a single end site |
|
5.4.2. Assignment of multiple /48s to a single end site |
|
|
5.4.3. Assignment to operator’s infrastructure. |
|
5.4.3. Assignment to operator’s infrastructure. |
|
|
5.5. Registration |
|
5.5. Registration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skipping to change at line 104 |
|
skipping to change at line 104 |
|
|
8.4. Acknowledgment |
|
8.4. Acknowledgment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction |
|
1. Introduction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1. Overview |
|
1.1. Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document describes policies for the allocation and assignment of |
|
This document describes policies for the allocation and assignment of |
|
|
globally-unique Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) address space. It |
|
globally-unique Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) address space. It |
|
|
updates and obsoletes the existing Provisional IPv6 Policies in |
|
updates and obsoletes the existing Provisional IPv6 Policies in |
|
|
effect since 1999 [RIRv6-Policies]. Policies described in this |
|
effect since 1999 [RIRv6-Policies]. Policies described in this |
|
|
|
document are are intended to be adopted by each registry. However, |
|
document are intended to be adopted by each registry. However, |
|
|
adoption of this document does not preclude local variations in each |
|
adoption of this document does not preclude local variations in each |
|
|
region or area. |
|
region or area. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RFC2373, RFC2373bis] designate 2000::/3 to be global unicast address |
|
[RFC2373, RFC2373bis] designate 2000::/3 to be global unicast address |
|
|
space that IANA may allocate to the RIRs. In accordance with |
|
space that IANA may allocate to the RIRs. In accordance with |
|
|
[RFC2928, RFC2373bis, IAB-Request], IANA has allocated initial ranges |
|
[RFC2928, RFC2373bis, IAB-Request], IANA has allocated initial ranges |
|
|
of global unicast IPv6 address space from the 2001::/16 address block |
|
of global unicast IPv6 address space from the 2001::/16 address block |
|
|
to the existing RIRs. This document concerns the initial and |
|
to the existing RIRs. This document concerns the initial and |
|
|
subsequent allocations of the 2000::/3 unicast address space, for |
|
subsequent allocations of the 2000::/3 unicast address space, for |
|
|
which RIRs formulate allocation and assignment policies. Because end |
|
which RIRs formulate allocation and assignment policies. Because end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skipping to change at line 371 |
|
skipping to change at line 371 |
|
|
However, RIRs must apply procedures that reduce the possibility of |
|
However, RIRs must apply procedures that reduce the possibility of |
|
|
fragmented address space which may lead to a loss of routability. |
|
fragmented address space which may lead to a loss of routability. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3. Minimum Allocation |
|
4.3. Minimum Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIRs will apply a minimum size for IPv6 allocations, to facilitate |
|
RIRs will apply a minimum size for IPv6 allocations, to facilitate |
|
|
prefix-based filtering. |
|
prefix-based filtering. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum allocation size for IPv6 address space is /32. |
|
The minimum allocation size for IPv6 address space is /32. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4. Consideration of IPv4 Infrastructure |
|
4.4. Consideration of IPv4 infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where an existing IPv4 service provider requests IPv6 space for |
|
Subject to section 5.1.3, existing IPv4 networks may be considered in |
|
|
eventual transition of existing services to IPv6, the number of |
|
determining the initial IPv6 allocation size. |
|
|
present IPv4 customers may be used to justify a larger request than |
|
|
|
|
would be justified if based solely on the IPv6 infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Policies for allocations and assignments |
|
5. Policies for allocations and assignments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1. Initial allocation |
|
5.1. Initial allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria |
|
5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To qualify for an initial allocation of IPv6 address space, an |
|
To qualify for an initial allocation of IPv6 address space, an |
|
|
organization must: |
|
organization must: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) be an LIR; |
|
a) be an LIR; |
|
|
b) not be an end site; |
|
b) not be an end site; |
|
|
c) plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organizations to which it |
|
c) plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organizations to which it |
|
|
will assign /48s, by advertising that connectivity through its |
|
will assign /48s, by advertising that connectivity through its |
|
|
single aggregated address allocation; and |
|
single aggregated address allocation; and |
|
|
d) have a plan for making at least 200 /48 assignments to other |
|
d) have a plan for making at least 200 /48 assignments to other |
|
|
organizations within two years. |
|
organizations within two years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1.2. Initial allocation size |
|
Private networks (those not connected to the public Internet) may |
|
|
|
|
also be eligible for an IPv6 address space allocation provided they |
|
|
|
|
meet equivalent criteria to those listed above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1.2. Minimum initial allocation size |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizations that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible |
|
Organizations that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible |
|
|
to receive a minimum allocation of /32. |
|
to receive a minimum allocation of /32. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizations may qualify for an initial allocation greater than /32 |
|
5.1.3. Larger initial allocations |
|
|
by submitting documentation that reasonably justifies the request. |
|
|
|
|
If so, the allocation size will be based on the number of existing |
|
Initial allocations larger than /32 may be justified if: |
|
|
users and the extent of the organization’s infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) The organization provides comprehensive documentation of |
|
|
|
|
planned IPv6 infrastructure which would require a larger allocation; or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) The organization provides comprehensive documentation of all of the |
|
|
|
|
following: |
|
|
|
|
– its existing IPv4 infrastructure and customer base, |
|
|
|
|
– its intention to provide its existing IPv4 services via IPv6, and |
|
|
|
|
– its intention to move some of its existing IPv4 customers to IPv6 |
|
|
|
|
within two years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In either case, an allocation will be made which fulfills the calculated |
|
|
|
|
address requirement, in accordance with the HD-Ratio based utilization |
|
|
|
|
policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2. Subsequent allocation |
|
5.2. Subsequent allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizations that hold an existing IPv6 allocation may receive a |
|
Organizations that hold an existing IPv6 allocation may receive a |
|
|
subsequent allocation in accordance with the following policies. |
|
subsequent allocation in accordance with the following policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria |
|
5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent allocation will be provided when an organization (ISP/LIR) |
|
Subsequent allocation will be provided when an organization (ISP/LIR) |
|
|
satisfies the evaluation threshold of past address utilization in |
|
satisfies the evaluation threshold of past address utilization in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skipping to change at line 515 |
|
skipping to change at line 530 |
|
|
RIR/NIR database. |
|
RIR/NIR database. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIR/NIRs will use registered data to calculate the HD-Ratio at the |
|
RIR/NIRs will use registered data to calculate the HD-Ratio at the |
|
|
time of application for subsequent allocation and to check for |
|
time of application for subsequent allocation and to check for |
|
|
changes in assignments over time. |
|
changes in assignments over time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRs shall maintain systems and practices that protect the security of |
|
IRs shall maintain systems and practices that protect the security of |
|
|
personal and commercial information that is used in request |
|
personal and commercial information that is used in request |
|
|
evaluation, but which is not required for public registration. |
|
evaluation, but which is not required for public registration. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizations that receive an allocation from APNIC can choose whether |
|
|
|
|
or not their customer assignment registrations should be publicly |
|
|
|
|
available. If the organization does not indicate a choice, or it chooses |
|
|
|
|
to hide its customer assignment registrations, then those records will |
|
|
|
|
not be visible in the public whois database. Whois queries on these |
|
|
|
|
records will return details of the allocation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6. Reverse lookup |
|
5.6. Reverse lookup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When an RIR/NIR delegates IPv6 address space to an organization, it |
|
When an RIR/NIR delegates IPv6 address space to an organization, it |
|
|
also delegates the responsibility to manage the reverse lookup zone |
|
also delegates the responsibility to manage the reverse lookup zone |
|
|
that corresponds to the allocated IPv6 address space. Each |
|
that corresponds to the allocated IPv6 address space. Each |
|
|
organization should properly manage its reverse lookup zone. When |
|
organization should properly manage its reverse lookup zone. When |
|
|
making an address assignment, the organization must delegate to an |
|
making an address assignment, the organization must delegate to an |
|
|
assignee organization, upon request, the responsibility to manage the |
|
assignee organization, upon request, the responsibility to manage the |
|
|
reverse lookup zone that corresponds to the assigned address. |
|
reverse lookup zone that corresponds to the assigned address. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of changes. 11 change blocks. |
|
23 lines changed or deleted |
|
46 lines changed or added |
|
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.42. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |