| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
At 18:25 02/02/06 +0900, MAEMURA Akinori wrote: >| >Do you think the bandwidth estimation as to the number of customers >| >supported in Japan is the same as it will be in India or China or >| >Australia? The answer to this question is critical I guess. >| >| A good point. I guess JPNIC simply doesn't know. >| >| However, my analysis of the JPNIC proposal might be split into two parts. >| >| 1) JP community finds /24 per a chassis is too small for recent rapid >| development. So the new guideline is not effective at all, at least >| in Japan. >| 2) One solution which may be reasonable is /23 for 30Mbps cable and >| /24 for 10Mbps one. An assumption here is that operators who expect >| small demands of customers deploy 10Mbps cable. Doesn't this mean that although JPNIC does not know the relationship between bandwidth estimation and the number of potential users, it estimates that 30Mbps will hold nearly 500 users and 10Mbps will hold about 250 users. I think this means that JPNIC knows that 30Mbps will hold at least 500 users in 3 months term considering the address allocation process. May I ask a question? Since I am not familiar with cable technology, I thought that cable modems are placed in every head end. I think I saw somewhere that average home passes per head end is 500. Please correct me if I am wrong. Yoshi - - This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net
