Re: [WG-BB] Draft documents from Tokyo meeting

[Takashi Arano <arano@byd.ocn.ad.jp>]

Obata-san,

Thank you for your input. Let me clarify your comments.

As your opinion, the first allocation rule should be 
applied also when allocating for new xDSL services.
Is this what you mean?

Furthermore, in such a sense, the first allocation rule 
can be applied also when allocating for new PoP.
Do you think if this is true?

I would like to solicit other members' opinions.

Regards,
Takashi Arano

At 21:29 01/06/21, Yoshihiro Obata wrote:
>At 14:24 01/06/18 +0900, Takashi Arano wrote:
>>All,
>>
>>Here are Tokyo meeting minutes and a proposal draft.
>>
>>Draft cable policy document:
>>http://www.apnic.net/drafts/cable.html
>>
>>Minutes from the Tokyo wg-bb meeting :
>>http://www.apnic.net/drafts/cable_minutes.html
>>
>>
>>The draft was a consensus of discussion in the meeting
>>and written by Gerard. Thank all meeting participants
>>for great discussion and drafting(especially to Gerard!).
>>
>>Now we need any comments from this mailing list.
>>Feel free to send anything. It would be appreciated if you could
>>do this by 6 July, Friday. Thanks.
>
>
>I think the document does not cover the cases where ISPs outsource ADSL access circuits to wholesale providers.  In case where an existing ISP starts providing  additional access method to existing ISP service, it should be regarded as a new ADSL service.  Otherwise, their IP address allocation will be mixed among dial up services and ADSL services.
>
>Yoshi 
>-
>- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net

-
- This list (wg-bb) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net