| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andy Linton wrote: > Randy Bush wrote: >> i suspect a logistic mistake was made in the proposal. if it had been >> split into two, conversion to aud the raise separated, the former would >> likely have passed as getting income in a volatile currency other than >> the one in which apnic incurs expenses is plain silly. >> >> so let me ask a question. would anyone strongly object if the ec was to >> institute just the currency change for 2008 starting in 1 jan? that is, >> fees to be charged in aud as opposed to usd. > > I've thought this is a good idea for some time and still do. I hope others > reading this will agree. I agree it's a good thing. thanks - gaurab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG8hWkSo7fU26F3X0RArLyAJ9ZYx98cb1KkBDqIaFp4JgGbJas2wCg9rIX 8my2glYCIBaqBtneY+XiEpU= =tL0o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
