![]() |
![]() |
|
You're here: Home |
Randy Bush wrote: > i suspect a logistic mistake was made in the proposal. if it had been > split into two, conversion to aud the raise separated, the former would > likely have passed as getting income in a volatile currency other than > the one in which apnic incurs expenses is plain silly. > > so let me ask a question. would anyone strongly object if the ec was to > institute just the currency change for 2008 starting in 1 jan? that is, > fees to be charged in aud as opposed to usd. I've thought this is a good idea for some time and still do. I hope others reading this will agree. Regards, andy