APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists wg-apnic-fees 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Wg-apnic-fees] APNIC membership fee structure proposal



Dear Paul,

Many thanks for your respond.

At 17:01 11/08/06 +1000, Paul Wilson wrote:
1. About the Tier Membership for member that already have both IPv4 and
IPv6, is it will be charged as 2 seperate accounts ?

For a member with both IPv4 and IPv6 the tier is assessed separately for each, and the member then takes the higher tier.

For instance if they have /15 of IPv4 (which is Tier F) and /32 of IPv6 (Tier E) then they would be assessed as Tier F.

Clear for me.



2. About the 50% discount for NIR members: If they have an IPv6, is it
the same fees structure will be apply as in IPv4 ?

The discount would apply to the Tier that is assessed. In the example above, the annual fee for Tier F, with 50% discount, would be $5760 per annum.

Clear for me.



3. There are several discussion in our member that suggest about the fee
structure for more than a /16:
- Fees are being raised up on reducing of 1 bit (not 2 bits as in the
proposal).
- Fees are not count twicely on each bit.

I am not sure I understand these points however if you wish to propose some specific modification or amendment, please feel free to do so.

Some of our members, especially the large member are concerning about the fees that they have to pay are increasing two times.

For example, if they already have a /16 and they would request for up to a /15, than they have to pay as a /14 for them the fees are very high.

14      F       11520   5760
16      E       5760    2880

What they are purposing is: for the tier less than /16, the count will be start as reducing of 1 bit and the fees are not the same with the /14.

14      F       11520   5760
15      X       .....   .....
16      E       5760    2880

Another question, is this proposal also will eliminate the Small Multihoming under IPv4 ? since in here you also put the members with tier /24 , /23 and /22 ?

Regards,
Ahmad Alkazimy


Regards,

Paul

_______________________________________________
Wg-apnic-fees mailing list
Wg-apnic-fees@apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/wg-apnic-fees