Re: [sig-policy] Posible Spam** Re: prop-051: Global policy for the allocation of the remaining IPv4 address space

[Francisco Obispo <fobispo@cenit.gob.ve>]

hi David,

my response bellow,

regads.

P.S. It might also be argued that the paradox you note could be a  

blessing in disguise as it means those in developing countries will  

make the shift to IPv6 that much sooner.

The problem with this, is that there isn't a transition method that allows

IPv6-only networks to connect to the IPv4 world, so until there's a

way to do that, this isn't going to happen.

The proposal's spirit, is to give each RIR the opportunity to develop

their own transition plan, it can be restrictive or super-restrictive, I think

this is up to the community.

This policy affects the outcome on how many /8s are finally assigned

after the pool has exhausted. Of course some may benefit, some not,

but we have already a precedence, in a case where a region would benefit

and decided to turn down a proposal (IPv4 HD-Ratio).

Even IANA benefits from the proposal, so I think we should concentrate

on the size of the final allocation, which has been the main drawback.

-francisco