| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:35 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
So then you're suggesting that we need also a complete review of the "site"definition ? Any specific suggestions ?
I think it would be less complicated to just make a proposal for certain classes of non-ISP network to qualify for an allocation. Changing the definition of 'end site' makes things more complicated and is likely to have unanticipated knock-on consequences.
I'm still not entirely certain which groups of networks you want to include. The example you gave was a university but there are a number of universities that already have IPv6 allocations without this policy. How are they different from the universities you are trying to help? Is it a major difference in the way they run their networks or is it something else?
Regards, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
