Re: [sig-policy] prop-045: Proposal to modify "end site"definition and allow end sites to receive IPv6 allocations

[Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>]

Jordi,

I am not sure I understand the intention behind your proposal  
properly. You seem to want to broaden the definition of "end site" to  
include multi-site networks and allow allow this kind of end site to  
qualify for an allocation when they will provide connectivity to  
'sites' within their own organisation.

Allowing organisations that only make internal assignments to qualify  
for a /32 allocation would make dramatically increase the number of  
organisations who qualify. I think almost any organisation with  
multiple departments and internal contracts could qualify for a /32  
allocation. Is that your intention or have I misunderstood you?

Regards,

--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison