| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
> Is four objections out of more than 1,000 members substantial > enough to reverse the process? Out of the 990+ LIR members of APNIC, only one of these has emailed the sig-policy mailing list supporting this proposal, while 4 times that number have objected to the proposal. I don't think this satisfies any definition of consensus that you choose to adopt. I would suggest that the referee (Izumi-san) has made a decision, and that APNIC members (LIR and NIR) respect that decision and work towards implementing a revised fee structure that has been mentioned previously. Regards, Tim.
