[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6peraddressfeeforNIRs"
Great, how do the NIRs feel about this?
Would you like to work closely on the proposal by setting up a working
group? If yes, we can call for the volunteers publicly from the whole
community.
Izumi
Philip Smith wrote:
> Hi Izumi-san,
>
> Izumi Okutani said the following on 24/11/05 12:30:
>
>>As Philip has mentioned, we can still continue discussions over this
>>proposal and work on it. We have to make a decision over this particular
>>proposal at some point whether or not we postpone the decision, and I
>>felt that more discussions are needed which was why I declared
>>"no-consensus".
>>
>>This however doesn't mean it is the end of the proposal - we can
>>continue discussions on this topic.
>
>
> I'd be delighted to. I fully understand the original motivation of the
> proposal, but the proposed solution had a financial impact on APNIC. A
> solution which has no financial impact on APNIC would set a better
> precedent, otherwise we could end up with a situation which Randy
> described earlier.
>
>
>>Perhaps, we can set up a working group to work on this?
>
>
> That's a good idea, I'd be happy to participate if you'd find that at
> all useful.
>
> philip
> --
>
