Re: [sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments: [prop-031-v002] "Proposal to amend APNIC IPv6 assignment and utilisation requirement policy"

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> Another interpretation is that nothing has changed in the APNIC
> IPv6 fee structure, and that an explicit proposal would need to
> be made to propose aligning the IPv6 fee structure with the IPv6
> allocation policy in the event that APNIC formally adopts this
> proposed IPv6 allocation policy

perhaps, analogous to some folk's suggestions in the nir paf
discussion, the on-going financial fix could be part of this
proposal before it is finalized?

[ american (and general english?) idiom time again: what's
  good for the goose is good for the gander ]

randy