Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments: [prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6 per address fee for NIRs"

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> The situation of IP address usage has been and will be 
> changing and some day we will need fix.  NIRs community 
> thinks PAF scheme no longer fits to adjust the contribution
> from NIRs.  I admit that such topics are not of policy but 
> of business operations of APNIC, but SIGs are working for
> having open discussions.

if it is such a small amount today, as you say, then why is it
needed to deal with it today?  certainly a scaled charge with
a minimum is not so complex that it places an employee cost
burden on the nirs to calculate it!

randy