Re: [sig-nir] Discussion about long-term NIR fee reballancing

[Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp>]

Thanks for the suggestion, Maemura-san.
I think it's a good idea to discuss the long term fee revision.

I will add this on the agenda and confirm at the session tomorrow if
everyone is happy with this.


Izumi

MAEMURA Akinori wrote:
> Colleagues,
> 
> The Executive Council had its meeting today and there was 
> disccussed about a long-term solution for NIR fee.
> 
> We need this discussion independently from our current 
> discussion of abolishing/discounting IPv6 per address fee.
> 
> Please note long-term one will not influence short-term one.
> 
> I'd like Paul to briefly introduce this long-term solution
> in this coming NIR-SIG.  
> 
> I think Toshi will present JPNIC's original idea for a long-
> term solution, which was introduced in wg-nir-fee before, 
> in the presentation of JPNIC Update, then I will be happy 
> if you allow to have some time for Paul to introduce that.
> 
> 
> Izumi,  please take it into account this additional agenda,
> if there is no objection.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> MAEMURA Akinori for the Executive Council
> _______________________________________________
> sig-nir mailing list
> sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
> 
>