[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dhaka Workshop: Time to challenge govt control on information
Culture of silence must end: Time to challenge govt control on
information
By Marwaan Macan-Markar
DHAKA: Fifty years or more of freedom have not made South Asia's
governments more transparent or accountable. Instead they cling to a
policy of confidentiality on official information inherited from
British colonialists, rights activists said at a meeting here.
The region's more than one billion people are denied the basic right
to know the details of government policies which affect their lives
and survival.
Far from being a transparent government, there is a wall between the
democratically-elected rulers and the ruled, resulting in the
people's exclusion from decision-making processes.
"The secrecy of government that we inherited during colonialism still
continues, and the large section of the poor continue to suffer
because of a lack of information," declared former Bangladeshi
foreign minister Kamal Hossain.
"There can be no effective accountability .. unless the people have
the right to information," he asserted at a three-day workshop last
week on the 'Right to Information in South Asia', organised by the
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
The time has come to challenge the 'culture of silence' that prevails
among governments in the region, speaker after speaker from India,
Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh said.
Deepika Udagama, a lecturer in human rights at Colombo's law faculty,
said the Sri Lankan experience of democracy has been restricted to
participation in elections.
But that is changing, she added. "Now there is talk of direct
participation; now the people want to know what is happening in their
governments."
In the region, only two countries have responded to a grassroots
demand for the conceding of the 'right to information' - India and
Pakistan. In both cases, however, the government bills still have to
be approved by their parliaments.
The Indian bill, for instance, titled the Freedom Of Information
Bill, 1997, guarantees every citizen the right to "secure access to
information under the control of public authorities, consistent with
public interest, in order to promote openness, transparency and
accountability."
It was drafted following huge public pressure for openness created by
non-governmental organisations led by the Rajasthan-based workers and
farmers group called Mazdoor Kisaan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS).
Begun 10 years ago, villagers who form the backbone of the MKSS
started campaigning for a 'social audit', which demanded a scrutiny
on the monies spent for development by village councils.
Raising slogans like 'Right to information; a Right to Survive' and
'Our Money; Our Accounts', the villagers numbering in their thousands
forced open the financial books that had been closed to them.
"We have forced the government to be accountable," declared
Madhusudan Mistry, an NGO activist who said the struggle for
transparency in government programmes has been rewarding.
Previously, bureaucrats and politicians stonewalled and dawdled over
programmes, the full details of which were not known to people,
saying their work could not be challenged.
Interestingly the 'right to information' demand has been voiced by
the marginalised sections of people in the region's countries.
In South Asia, those below the poverty line, the rural poor, make up
a larger slice of the population. Yet since independence in the late
1940s, the effects of development have hardly trickled in their
direction. For decades they have stagnated, unaware of the money and
the benefits due their way.
Said the New Delhi-based Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative's
director Maja Daruwala: "This right is vital to the poor of our
region. They will be the actual beneficiaries."
Groups like hers would like to see the government give access to
records of proceedings and meeting, copies of decisions, rules and
notices, copies of entries in government registers, copies of
accounts, of maps, of drawings and of work sites.
If enacted into law by their governments, South Asia would be
complying with Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, 1948, which states: "Everyone has a right to freedom of
opinion and expression; This right includes freedom to hold opinions
without interference and to seek receive and impart information and
ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."
In addition, the Commonwealth Law Ministers conference in Barbados in
1990 had declared: "Public participation in the democratic and
governmental process was at its most meaningful when citizens had
adequate access to official information."
But the process of putting this 'right' in statute books looks set to
be an arduous one. Activists at the meeting agreed that one stumbling
block before them is the 'Official Secrets Act', another legacy of
colonial rule.
South Asia's belief in democracy will overcome the hurdles,
participants felt. As Salma Sobhan, prominent Bangladeshi lawyer
said: "The people of South Asia have stood up against the tide of
authoritarianism. They will support any idea that strengthens their
rights." -Dawn/Inter Press Service
(c) The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 1999
http://www.dawn.com/daily/19990711/int9.htm