[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLOBAL-V6] PI space under IPv6
On Jan 19, 2007, at 4:19 AM, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Peter Sherbin wrote:
<snip>
PI is just a requirement from users. The infrustructure to support
it needs fixing,
hence there is this discussion. Actually people asking for PI are
more concerned
with a pool of IDs to name/control/monitor their items/things and
less so with
routing. So split ID/locator. Give IDs to people. Build routing on
locators. ISPs
will follow the new architecture. Opposing ISPs will be naturally
replaced by new
willing ones.
At the point a user want PI without being able to justify getting
their own address space based on the usage, they shouldn´t get it.
As said before, only organization big enough to justify their own
netblock should get it. No PI or PA, just a netblock.
Why should the size of an organization (as opposed to the networking
needs of an organization) be
of relevance here ?
Regards
Marshall
--
------------------------------
Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID
roger@jorgensen.no | - IPv6 is The Key!
-------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
global-v6@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
