On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Joao Damas wrote:
As has been discussed at ARIN, this is a good way to get the
government to
declare the RIR a monopoly engaging in anticompetitive
behavior. I for
one don't want that.
Pekka, this doesn't sound like the right way to do policy, and yes,
things that smell like "big guys get it, small guys don't" will be
looked at suspiciously and rightly so. Criteria ought to be of a
technical nature.
I'm assuming this is already in reference to, "PI should cost money"
instead of "PI shouldn't be available, period"...
Larger end-sites already have 10-20k+ annual budget (most have much,
much larger than that): caused by CAPEX by getting at least two
routers, OPEX by paying to multiple ISPs for fibers, transit, etc. and
salaries of network engineering staff.
AFAICS, whether or not a PI space would cost 0, 1000 or 5000 USD a
year is NOT a barrier for entry. It's just *one* metric (you may be
able to think of technical metrics that could imply the same, I can't)
to say, "if you REALLY don't need this, it'd be nice if you seriously
consider PA address space".
Don't want PI: propose a feasible alternative that provides the same
functionality under the current routing system, while looking for
a better
system
Use PA addresses and Unique Local Addresses if you really think you
need them. Push for shim6. Put some work on solving the remaining
problems if there really are any that aren't caused by the desire to
graze the commons for free.
Maybe I should have snipped this quote, as this seems like a rathole
which isn't worth exploring (again) here...
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
PPML mailing list
PPML@arin.net
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml