1. Each assignment must be accompanied by a recurring fee (at least
1000-2000 USD/EUR a year, preferably 5000+). This is peanuts
(compared to other costs) to anyone who actually needs this
multihoming solution. However, this ensures at least some minimum
usage barrier ("those who don't really need this can use different
multihoming solutions"), and recovery of the resources back to RIR
after the company has gone bankrupt or no longer needs the addresses.
If you don't know where to put the extra money, donate it to ISOC or
something.
As has been discussed at ARIN, this is a good way to get the government to
declare the RIR a monopoly engaging in anticompetitive behavior. I for
one don't want that.
2. one-size-fits-all assignments, period. You get a /48 or /32 (I
don't have much preference here), but you must not be able to justify
for larger space. This is to avoid the organization from getting a
larger block and chopping it into smaller pieces and polluting the
global routing table with more specifics which would get past prefix
length filters.
With the current ARIN policy proposal, you'd get a /48, with a /44
reserved for growth. Would you advocate giving everyone a /44 up front
instead? Or something else? I don't have too much preference here, FWIW.
