[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GLOBAL-V6] Re: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN
The problem with your suggestion is that then provides advantage "forever"
to those that apply now (before the sunset clause comes into effect), which
I think is unfair.
Regards,
Jordi
> De: "Durand, Alain" <Alain_Durand@cable.comcast.com>
> Responder a: <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
> Fecha: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 09:23:29 -0400
> Para: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, <global-v6@lists.apnic.net>
> Conversación: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN
> Asunto: RE: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN
>
>
>>> G) a key thing is to limit the size of the swamp that would be
>>> created, or more specifically limit its growth. So it might
>> be a good
>>> idea to have a sunset clause in the policy, like it will have to be
>>> revisited in 2 years or when a certain allocation (or
>> allocation rate) threshold will be reached.
>>
>> Somehow it is what I'm defining: A sunset based on a
>> technical solution availability.
>
> Yes, the goal is similar, the means are differents.
> The sunset clause I suggest specifically does not ask
> those PI to be returned at some point in the future.
>
> - Alain.
**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Slides available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
