[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GLOBAL-V6] Re: [ppml] PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN
Hi Iljitsch,
Below, in-line.
Regards,
Jordi
> De: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
> Responder a: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> Fecha: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:54:56 +0200
> Para: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> CC: "v6ops@ops.ietf.org" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "ppml@arin.net"
> <ppml@arin.net>, "shim6@psg.com" <shim6@psg.com>
> Asunto: Re: [ppml] PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN
>
> On 14-apr-2006, at 13:39, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>
>> my proposal is ensuring that we
>> have those 4 years+3 for allowing the people either to return the
>> block, or
>> become an LIR and avoid renumbering an any changes in their network.
>
> I don't see the logic of an end-user organization becoming a LIR in
> the sense that they give out address space to other end-user
> organizations. And even if they did, a /48 or even a reserved /44
> (why not give them the /44 right away then, at least that saves us
> from accepting /48s which is dangerous because of potentially
> deaggregated /32s and we have IPv6 addresses aplenty) isn't big
> enough to be a LIR without obtaining a new address block.
I don't see it either now, but some people that today may not be a LIR
candidate, but need multihoming, can be in a different situation in a few
years from now. I don't need to say that in the policy, but I think is more
clear if it is said.
>
>> By the way, it may happen, and I'm hoping so, that the technical
>> solution
>> don't make necessary to return the PI block anymore, and in that
>> case, we
>> will be even able to remove at that time the "temporarily" point in
>> the
>> policy (if it becomes accepted).
>
> If the PI blocks are given out according to a geographic addressing
> plan we leave the door open for geographic aggregation in the future.
> I know few people believe in this today but if we're going to have PI
> anyway, giving out those prefixes geographically doesn't do any harm
> but it allows for future developments.
>
This is a good example of a possible way, of course.
**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Slides available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
