Re: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Marcelo and all,

marcelo bagnulo wrote:

> > > So, do you think that the isps would benefit from a homogenous
> > policy in all
> > > the aspects or they would just require homogeneity in some
> > specific aspects
> > > of the policy (such size of the address blocks assigned).
> >
> > Your suggestion here Marcelo would set one region off against another
> > sooner or later.  Hence one reason why such a suggestion is ill advised.
>
> Oops, sorry this was not a suggestion, it was a question, but i forgot the ?
> let me rephrase it correctly:
>
> So, do you think that the isps would benefit from a homogenous policy in all
> the aspects or they would just require homogeneity in some specific aspects
> of the policy (such size of the address blocks assigned)?

  Well this is only a leading and/or suggestive question.  Hence not
much different than your first version in statement form.  And so still
you are suggesting in question form of setting one region off against
another, sooner or later.  Hence the answer is or should be no,
as to do so would be ill advised.

  Perhaps you are having recurring Freudian slips?  >;)

>
>
> Regards, marcelo
>
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks, marcelo
> > >
> > > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > > De: global-v6-admin@lists.apnic.net
> > > > [mailto:global-v6-admin@lists.apnic.net]En nombre de Randy Bush
> > > > Enviado el: miercoles, 21 de enero de 2004 23:06
> > > > Para: Anne Lord
> > > > CC: global-v6@lists.apnic.net
> > > > Asunto: Re: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > It is useful to observe that this policy is globally co-ordinated
> > > > > rather than a global policy: there were never any agreements by
> > > > > any RIR staff that there would be a single global policy.
> > > >
> > > > the more interesting, at least to me, question is whether or not
> > > > there was such an understanding by the member isps of the various
> > > > regions.  i think that many of those of us who do routing are
> > > > indeed expecting a homogenous policy.  hence the creation of this
> > > > mailing list.
> > > >
> > > > randy
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > global-v6 mailing list
> > > > global-v6@lists.apnic.net
> > > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > global-v6 mailing list
> > > global-v6@lists.apnic.net
> > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
> >     Pierre Abelard
> >
> > "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> > liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> > P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> > United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> > ===============================================================
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> > Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
> >
> >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. William's
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801