[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
> The 200-user limit has not really been a problem in the RIPE region.
>
> ISPs that are serious about providing IPv6 usually have 200 customers,
> and are willing to offer all of them IPv6 services.
>
> People need to understand that, as of today, *nobody* can be *sure*
> to have 200 IPv6-enabled customers in 2 years. If the customers have
> no interest, there won't be any.
>
> The key item is "have the *intention* to provide services to 200 (or more)
> customers".
I think we fully agree ,
It has been mentioned here in this list and some other places that the
current policy as stated (atually it does not mention the word intetion but
the word plan to make 200 /48 )causes that lirs don't apply becuase they
feel that they don't qualify (at least some feel that way)
The lacnic policy proposal is an attempt to overcome this issue, requiring a
condition not based on the adoption of IPv6 but rather on the efforts made
by the requesting lir to provide IPv6 services.
>
> Being overly restrictive in the IPv6 allocation policy is a bad signal -
> there is enough address space, and the global routing table will easily
> cope with 2000 prefixes per region - we should try to make people
> *accept* IPv6, not hinder its deployment based on some unreasonable
> fears.
Agree
regards, marcelo
>
> Gert Doering
> -- NetMaster
> --
> Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:
> 58081 (57882)
>
> SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
> 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
>
