APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists global-v6 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region



Hi,

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

[...]

Regarding the "200 customers", not in the RIPE region many NRENs have
allocations even though they do not have 200 universities to serve.  There
has to be some flexibility in the RIR interpreting the intent of the
applicant, rather than the applicant playing the numbers game to get their
request granted.
Where this happens it tends to be because universities plan to assign a /48 to each student or staff "customer" with a connection to the university network.

I would much rather see consistent text in all RIRs than divergence of
policies.

One area that is a little fuzzy (I would welcome clarification) is the
experimental allocations that RIRs can make.  These would seem the place
for some consistency (in policy and pricing!) now that 6bone prefixes
are no longer available.   Any small startups or experimenting ISPs could
then utilise such address space, helping the bootstrap issue while keeping
a more consistent policy?
In the RIPE region these are time limited and intended for real experiments rather than ISPs that want to try out IPv6.

The experiment needs to be documented, whether "in the form of a current IETF Experimental RFC (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt see Sec. 4.2.1) or an 'experiment proposal' detailing the resources required and the activities to be carried out".

Additionally, the results of the experiment have to be "published free of charge and free from disclosure constraints."

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6policy.html#experiment-assignments

Regards,

--
leo vegoda
RIPE NCC
Registration Services Manager