| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
It had been my understanding that IPv6 policy would be co-ordinated among the RIRs, but this seems to imply a regional policy like IPv4. That's also one method of the policy process that's proved to work well, but it should at least be a concious decision by the RIRs(or its communities). Could someone from the RIRs share the position about this? Izumi JPNIC From: German Valdez <german@lacnic.net> Subject: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:16:29 -0300 > > > FYI LACNIC is calling for last comments for new policies to be applied next > year. One of this policies is a new criteria for IPv6 Initial allocation. > > This proposal is the result of the analysis of the LACNIC IPv6 WG and the > discussion held during our Open Policy Forum in The Havana, Cuba > > You can review this proposal at http://lacnic.net/en/last-call.html > > On december 9th we started a 45 days period for comments for these > policies, including the IPv6 one. Comments will be received through our > policy public list politicas@lacnic.net, subscription to this list is open > at http://lacnic.net/en/lists.html. Any comments are welcomed. > > Regards > > > > German Valdez > Policy Liaison > LACNIC > > _______________________________________________ > global-v6 mailing list > global-v6@lists.apnic.net > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6 >
