![]() |
![]() |
|
You're here: Home |
Randy and all,
Someday I hope that the IETF will renew it's once very good
cooperation with the now much lager and more diverse
Stakeholder/user community.
But of course I am one of those fellows that believes that
hope springs eternal...
But after the verio fiasco, one has to at least wonder...
Randy Bush wrote:
> > It is clear from the policy criteria that the policy was meant for the
> > RIRs to only provide /32 to transit providers. No discussion was done
> > about private networks as the RFC 1918 concept was not to apply. It
> > would appear to me that there needs to be a policy proposal to address
> > the private network issue in which globally unique private addresses are
> > required for networks using IPv6.
>
> yep. and it would be wise to coordinate this with ietf work in this
> space. kinda like we used to do when the internet was still a
> cooperative place.
>
> randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> global-v6 mailing list
> global-v6@lists.apnic.net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801