| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
> It is clear from the policy criteria that the policy was meant for the > RIRs to only provide /32 to transit providers. No discussion was done > about private networks as the RFC 1918 concept was not to apply. It > would appear to me that there needs to be a policy proposal to address > the private network issue in which globally unique private addresses are > required for networks using IPv6. yep. and it would be wise to coordinate this with ietf work in this space. kinda like we used to do when the internet was still a cooperative place. randy
