[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hm-staff] Re: [GLOBAL-V6]The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy
Hi Leo,
I agree that it is difficult to fix the evaluation criteria when the
policy is ambiguous. Thanks for sharing the situation in the RIPE
region.
Izumi
From: leo vegoda <leo@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [hm-staff] Re: [GLOBAL-V6]The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:33:02 +0200
> Hi Izumi,
>
> Izumi Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> >Thanks for your comment and sharing APNIC's position, Son.
> >
> >It would be nice to learn the situation in other regions too. I
> >assume RIRs are working very closely in request evaluation as well,
> >but perhaps, we need further discussions if the situation differs by
> >regions?
>
> As has been noted, the current policy is not clear. This makes things
> difficult for both those requesting address space and those evaluating
> requests. There are no clear criteria for approving requests for a
> closed use network. Consequently, decisions on requests for address
> space for private networks tend to be made on a case-by-case basis. We
> have not had many requests for space for closed networks. This is no
> doubt partly because the policy text can be interpreted to mean that
> such requests are not justified.
>
> This is certainly not ideal and we would support a change to the policy
> text that clarified its meaning.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> leo vegoda
> RIPE NCC
> Registration Services Manager
>
