![]() |
![]() |
|
You're here: Home |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Jeff Williams wrote: > Matthew and all, > > matthew.ford@bt.com wrote: > > > > > > The single biggest real problem with Ipv6 is the privacy exposure > > > > > to the user. When this problem is fixed or solved, Ipv6 will be > > > > > much more widely excepted. > > > > > > > > Could you elaborate on why IPv6 is exposes more of my privacy > > > > than IPv4 currently does? > > > > > > Yes. IPv6 in autoinstall does not allow for masking where IPv4 > > > does, simply put. > > > > er, yes it does. For example, WinXP uses RFC3041 privacy addresses *by > > default*. > > That wasn't what I was talking about or referring to.. And could you enlighten us all what you where refering to then as we are apparently not seeing any other 'privacy concerns'... Please elaborate ;) Greets, Jeroen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int. Comment: Jeroen Massar / jeroen@unfix.org / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/ iQA/AwUBP176ximqKFIzPnwjEQJCTgCgpwJLAakrgru3mhP/zhH47vCjlNcAnRFO E63yFrE1i/DwTR81nMdve5TC =bTDr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----