| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
Pekka Savola writes:
[...]
> It could be argued to be too low for those who specialize in very
^^^^^^^
I think you meant to say "too high".
> specific fields, and do not have many direct customers, but a lot of
> "last-mile" customers, for example:
> - national research networks whose only direct customers are the
> universities (or similar) (which may have tens of thousands of
> users each, but there may not be 200 universities in a country)
> - transit ISP's whose only direct customers are other ISP's
> - others?
Maybe the requirement could be better formulated in terms of "number
of sites (/48) aggregated" or "number of Logical IP Subnets (/64)
aggregated".
--
Simon.