| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
"Craig A. Huegen" wrote: ... > The challenge: how to define a "large multi-national end-user" such that > it would embody the spirit of what we're trying to accomplish. What we're trying to accomplish, presumably, is keeping the size of the default BGP4+ table under control while allowing large multinationals to be connected at many points to multiple ISPs using today's technology. However, I suspect that any attempt to define "large multinational" precisely is going to be hard. It would be a brave person who defines N and M in "has physical sites in at least N countries, and is connected worldwide to at least M different ISPs." Brian
