RE: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus

["Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@cisco.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Narten [mailto:narten@us.ibm.com] 
>
> But if they are global and want to 
> connect in multiple places, giving them muliple /48s, each 
> obtained from an appropriate upstream, *might* well make more sense.

I agree with you, as long as a better multi-homing scheme is provided
than the existing "most common bits" scheme.

> Thus, I think we aren't quite ready to right down what the 
> policy should be. (Hence, my argument for not having the 
> current document try to address the point in detail.)

'tis fair.  I wanted to get the issue on the table for discussion,
because the policies tend not to acknowledge the special cases that are
present.  I would rather we have an acknowledgement of the special cases
in the policy than several meetings with RIR's later. =)

/cah

-
- This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net