| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
> I'll second this and add comments similar to those I sent to multi6. > > Why shouldn't very large, multi-homed end sites be able to get PI > address space? > IMHO, there's no real problem for very large compagny. Cisco and other multinationnal compagnies have the size (in number of end-users site) of a little ISP. The main problem is for little and medium organizations which are IPv4 multihomed. Imaging a hosting compagny. 2 upstreams, an ASN, a /21 (IPv4), which is aggregated in only one upstream's routing table. This is possible in IPv4. Tomorrow, IPv6. The same organization don't need more than a /48. So what ? We give a sTLA ? -- Xavier Henner Responsable de l'expérimentation IPv6 Nerim -- Fournisseur d'accès à Internet URL: <http://www.nerim.net/> - - This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net
