RE: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus

To: "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net>
Subject: RE: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus
From: "Michel Py" <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:10:29 -0700
Cc: "Carlos Friacas" <cfriacas@fccn.pt>, <global-v6@lists.apnic.net>
Sender: owner-global-v6@lists.apnic.net
Thread-index: AcHlWA8alg9ajT97R2WzTrblHO6T6AAAC4eg
Thread-topic: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus

> Gert Doering wrote:
> I'm not sure whether there is an existing document, but I
> have seen discussions to this - "just" use multiple /48s,
> which IPv6 stacks and applications should be prepared for.

None of wich exists yet. So, let me make sure that I understand you correctly:
[mu;tihoming] "IPv6 can easily do that" means that it could, in the future, rewriting existing stacks, with a mechanism that nobody has published yet. Woah.

Michel.

-
- This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@Space.Net>

Prev by Date: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus
Next by Date: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus
Previous by thread: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus
Next by thread: Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread