Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Comments on AP Consensus

[Gert Doering <gert@Space.Net>]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:50:17AM -0700, Michel Py wrote:
> > Gert Doering wrote:
> > What's wrong about doing this?  Or getting a number of
> > /48s from a number of upstream providers, and multi-homing
> > to those (IPv6 can easily do that)?
> 
> Ah, that's a new twist. I'm sure you can point me to a document 
> that describes IPv6 multihoming?

I'm not sure whether there is an existing document, but I have seen
discussions to this - "just" use multiple /48s, which IPv6 stacks and
applications should be prepared for.

Similar to what people already do in IPv4 world, except that "many IPs
on one single machine for one single service" is something that is
natural for IPv6 and unusual for IPv4.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:   74810  (74196)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299

-
- This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net