[GLOBAL-V6] Allocations larger than /32

[Robert Kiessling <Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net>]

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> writes:

> I know what the draft says here, but I still claim that "number of used 
> /48s is not a useful metric to judge a network's size (or worthyness of 
> anything)".  Neither is "number of used IPv6 addresses".

> As a consequence, allocation criteria based on "number of /48s" are 
> not useful.

What are useful critera for allocations larger than the default size
(e.g. /32)?

That's an aspect I'm missing in the current discussion, and which the
proposal "all LIRs can get a /32, possibly with restrictions like they
must provide services to third parties" does not even touch.

Robert

-
- This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net