[GLOBAL-V6] Re: up a few thousand meters

[Takashi Arano <arano@gblx.ad.jp>]

Daniel,

I totally agree with you. Address policy and practices 
should be based on a good balance among various factors
and past experiences.

I do believe the current draft with some modifications 
proposed in this global ML is properly on this way.

Regards,
Takashi Arano

At 20:08 02/02/12, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:

>    **** Please read Randy's message - again - and once more.
>
>I follow the discussions from even higher up than Randy ;-) but
>they give me a very disturbing and sometimes discouraging sense
>of deja-vu. Please consider the following -again:
>
>- address space, however large, is never quite as infinite as it may seem
>
>- V6 per-se does *not at all* solve the routing (table) problem
>
>- proper trade-offs between conservation, aggregation 
>   and ease of obtaining address space are curcuial, 
>   but not easily achieved/agreed 
>   and vary with time as technology develops
>
>- proper registration data is *crucial* for problem tracking 
>   and *security*, read: routing authentication
>- you can only usefully keep registration data at a neutral registry
>- it is *extremely hard* to clean up registration data that has not
>   been properly collected and/or maintained
>
>We have learned most of this by experience, let's not unlearn it.
>  
>Daniel 

-
- This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net