[GLOBAL-V6] RE: How to reduce the junk applications?

[turchanyi.geza@ln.matav.hu]

Tim,

I am sure that there is a misunderstanding here.

I never proposed anything that would limit the IPv6 address allocations to any
organisation. What I said, however,
     that address assignement need some experiences - even if there are "plenty
addresses";
     those wanted to have IPv6 address should go to an experienced LIR;
     and anyhow, IPv6 networking is not a turnkey issue. Probably we need
another two years for that.

LIR not equal to an ISP.

Best,
     Geza





Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> dátum: 2002.02.11 12:54:48

Címzett:       Turchányi Géza/PKI/HTC2@HTC2
Másolat:       Denesh Bhabuta <denesh@cyberstrider.net>, "Wilfried Woeber,
      UniVie/ACOnet" <woeber@cc.univie.ac.at>, global-v6@lists.apnic.net,
      ipv6-wg@ripe.net
Tárgy:         Re: Válasz: Re: Válasz: [GLOBAL-V6] RE: How to reduce the junk
      applications?



On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 turchanyi.geza@ln.matav.hu wrote:

> 2, You might heard about big research initiatives for the introduction of IPv6
> service. A good example is 6net.
>
> 6NET will have initially its own infrastructure, and there is a good reason
> behind: it would be too risky to use a production network.
>
> This is not the eventual address allocation restriction that will stop new
> IPv6-only companies to pop up, but the basic limitations of the technology and
> the installed services.

I disagree; if 6NET were a commercial project, not a EC-funded research and
development project, we would want IPv6 address space.   With your rules,
we could not get it, which is very bad.

Likewise with the Euro6IX project, where the partners are predominantly
telcos rather than NRENs.

Tim