APNIC Home APNIC Home
Info & FAQ |  Resource services |  Training |  Meetings |  Membership |  Documents |  Whois & Search |  Internet community

You're here:  Home  Mailing Lists global-v6 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GLOBAL-V6] New draft available: IPv6 Address Allocationand Assignment Global Policy



Arano-San,

thanks for your ideas, and I also want to say that your English is fine
(I had no difficulties at all understanding your proposal).  Of course, 
misunderstandings are a risk on a list with so many people from different 
language areas, so clarification is always a good idea.

My comments on your actual suggestion:

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:01:41AM +0900, Takashi Arano wrote:
> At 10:30 02/02/08, Takashi Arano wrote:
> >So my small modification proposal is to replace "any LIR" with 
> >   
> >- ISP or organization who assigns and registers /48s to organizations 
> >    other than itself
[..]
> Someone may think there is a hole in this definition,
> which is that any organization who disguise as an ISP 
> could get /32. Yes, this rule does not prevent this. 
> 
> However, first there is no rules to prevent this kind of 
> things. Second, this rule would give mental barriers to
> applicants. This is a big difference.
> 
> The bottom of this idea is to give a /32 to all who
> faithfully declares themselves as inside this category.

I like this idea.  I cannot speak for the "whole RIPE region", of course,
but I have the feeling that this would not conflict with the opinions
voiced by RIPE members on the last meeting (mainly the concern was "it
is too difficult for a startup or few-large-customers ISP to get IPv6
space").

I would drop the term "ISP", though, as this is very much undefined, and
just leave:

- Organization who assigns and registers /48s to organizations other 
  than itself

maybe add:

            ... and signs a contract that states that they intend to
  assign and register /48s to third parties, and that the /32 (or 
  whatever) will be void if no /48s for other organizations are 
  registered in one year (?).

This, of course, will not prevent someone from lying and then inventing
a handful of /48 registrations for non-existant customers.  But I agree 
with you that it will raise the barrier for "end users".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:   71887 (71770)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299

-
- This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net