Re: [GLOBAL-V6] New draft available: IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Global Policy

[Takashi Arano <arano@gblx.ad.jp>]

Gert,

At 00:29 02/02/08, Gert Doering wrote:

>If you don't like it, propose a third variant, but do it quickly, as
>people (especially in the APNIC region) really want to go on with IPv6,
>instead of just discussing policy year after year.  This seems to be
>different in the ARIN region - no big interest in IPv6 so far, but big 
>concerns about it.

Thank you for understand our situation.

Some ISPs in Asia already started or will start soon IPv6 commercial
services. One of them already got more than a hundred paying
IPv6 customers. Current "Provisional Policy" is far insufficient
for them.

Discussion would last forever if we seek complete consensus.
I rather like more prototyping approach, to decide quickly, 
get experience and feedback. This is what our Internet
community has been doing.

Regarding global policy, I am very happy to see very global
discussion here in this mailing list. I attended all recent
APNIC(of course!), RIPE, ARIN meetings and felt
IPv6 discussion in each region had been very different,
which had worried and actually disappointed me a little bit.
Let's keep discussing here globally.

Regards,
Takashi Arano
   

-
- This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net