[GLOBAL-V6] RE: How to reduce the junk applications?

["Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" <woeber@cc.univie.ac.at>]

>My proposal is simple: only such a LIR should get IPv6 addresses in 2002 and
>2003 that already had experiences in IPv4 registration for at least two years.

  Do you really want to propose to force "new kids on the block", intending
  to deploy IPv6 _from the beginning_, to spend money, human resources,
  etc. to build and operate a "disposable v4 network" for 2 years, in
  order to obtain IPv6 addresses?? How would they document the need for
  IPv*4* addresses when they intend to build an IPv*6* network??

  I'm getting more and more puzzled by the amount of creativity people
  come up with, simply in order to make deployment of IPv6 *difficult*!
  
  Till now I thought that people have been working on IPv6 as a better
  alternative, and that everyone going for IPv6 would help the v4 address
  space to last longer. Looks like I was wrong.
  
  Well, honestly, I think we need a reality check break.
  
  Regards,
  Wilfried.
  
Zu Tode gefuerchtet ist auch gestorben!
	(Apologies to the non-German-literate readers)
-
- This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net