Re: [GLOBAL-V6] New draft available: IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Global Policy

[Gert Doering <gert@Space.Net>]

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:47:37AM -0500, Thomas Narten wrote:
> It is far from clear that we have to throw the baby out with the bath
> water. If folks have issues with the specific policies in the global
> document, then can we first see if we can fix them in a way that makes
> sense to all, and doesn't make addressing the routing table growth
> problem even harder than it already is?  Please?

The RIPE community was not able to find any criteria based on IPv6 
address or /48 usage that found consensus.

The current proposal is our suggestion, which did find consensus in
the RIPE working group meeting.

If you don't like it, propose a third variant, but do it quickly, as
people (especially in the APNIC region) really want to go on with IPv6,
instead of just discussing policy year after year.  This seems to be
different in the ARIN region - no big interest in IPv6 so far, but big 
concerns about it.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:   71770 (72395)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299

-
- This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net