| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
You're here: Home |
On 7 Feb 2002, Robert Kiessling wrote: > Sorry to ask since I wasn't at the meeting: What was said about larger > allocation sizes than /32, e.g. for multinational ISPs for which a /32 > does not provide sufficient space for reasonable aggregation? Or for a national provider who may want to give a static /48 to a few hundred thousand customers. How much of the address assignment maths includes static vs dynamic provisioning? tim - - This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net
