![]() |
![]() |
|
You're here: Home |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net> > > Which list do you think is more fair ? > > > > The "toy" IPv4 Internet Early Experimentation Allocations ? > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space > > The Proof-of-Concept IPv8 Allocations ? > > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt > > Neither of that is of any relevance. > > The "Early Allocations" are exactly this: a way to get experience (and > they will likely be reclaimed if need areises). > > There is no IPv8. And there can not be a correlation of IP address ranges > and top level domains. Even less than there can be a correlation of IP > addresses and country borders. > Windows XP supports IPv6, with "IPv8 Addressing", that avoids the IPv6 Privacy Problem. http://www.dot-arizona.com/IPv8/IPv4/ IPv8 Address Blocks are Freely delegated to 2,048 Communities for Management, not routing. Again...for "Management", not routing. Routers do not know about country boundaries. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt The IN-ADDR.<TLD> zone is used to manage the address space. IN-ADDR.ARPA is one small zone of the 2,048 delegations. Enjoy your small piece of cyberspace. Windows XP will the world to now go to thousands of other places for FREE address space. Jim Fleming http://www.IN-ADDR.info http://www.DOT-Arizona.com - - This list (global-v6) is handled by majordomo@lists.apnic.net